Hearing record

Day 47

Witness: Major General Lesetja Senona

KZN Hawks provincial head Major General Lesetja Senona takes the stand, opening testimony on how a record 541kg cocaine seizure worth about R200 million came to be stored at the Port Shepstone Serious Organised Crime office - the facility from which it later vanished.

Major General Lesetja Senona - Day 47 of the Madlanga Commission

The day in brief

What you need to know

  • Major General Lesetja Senona, provincial head of the KZN Hawks (DPCI), began his evidence on the Port Shepstone cocaine theft.
  • The case concerns roughly 541kg of cocaine, valued at about R200 million, seized in a June 2021 Durban operation and later found missing from a Hawks strongroom.
  • Senona is reported to have acknowledged that he directed that the seized drugs be taken to the Port Shepstone facility.
  • His account intersects with those of Brigadier Campbell Nyuswa, Colonel Gavin Jacob, Warrant Officer Karl Sander and retired Lieutenant Colonel Jakobus Prinsloo.
  • Evidence before the commission has raised the question of whether the disappearance was an internal act rather than a simple security lapse, a matter that remains untested and unproven.

Full coverage

The day, in depth

A record seizure and a missing consignment

The commission heard evidence tracing the drugs to a June 2021 operation in Durban in which about 541kg of cocaine, with an estimated street value near R200 million, was seized. The consignment was subsequently stored at the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation's Serious Organised Crime office in Port Shepstone, KwaZulu-Natal. The cocaine was later reported missing from what was meant to be a secure strongroom.

Senona takes the stand

Senona, the provincial head of the KZN Hawks, opened his testimony on the storage decision and the chain of events around it. According to reporting on his evidence, he indicated that he had directed that the drugs be moved to the Port Shepstone office. The commission's terms of reference include allegations of criminality and corruption in the criminal justice system, and Senona's testimony was presented as part of that inquiry, not as any finding against him.

Our analysis

The bottom line

Senona's appearance places a senior Hawks commander at the centre of the Port Shepstone narrative. The archive treats him as a witness giving an account on the public record, and nothing in his testimony amounts to a finding of wrongdoing. The value of his evidence lies in mapping how a major seizure moved through the DPCI's custody chain.

The threads the commission is following - who chose the storage site, who held the keys, and who was asked to sit polygraphs - are questions of process and accountability. They matter because a record consignment disappeared from state custody, and the public record benefits from a clear, attributed account of each decision, wherever responsibility ultimately lies.

Analysis is the archive’s own comment on the public proceedings, grounded in the record above. It weighs the evidence and the process; questions of individual guilt are for the courts and the commission to decide. Everyone named is presumed innocent.