Hearing record

Day 90

Witness: Julius Mkhwanazi

Evidence led by Adv. Mahlape Sello SC

Suspended Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department deputy chief Julius Mkhwanazi returned to the stand as the Commission pressed him on a Rosebank robbery, missing precious stones and his ties to alleged underworld figures. Julius Mkhwanazi is a distinct person from Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, the KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner whose allegations sparked the inquiry.

Julius Mkhwanazi - Day 90 of the Madlanga Commission

The day in brief

What you need to know

  • Julius Mkhwanazi, the suspended EMPD deputy chief, resumed testimony under sustained challenge from evidence leaders. He is not the KZN commissioner of the same surname.
  • The Commission put to him a 2023 Rosebank operation in which precious stones said to be worth about R14.9 million allegedly went missing.
  • Evidence heard earlier came from 'Witness K', described as a former EMPD inspector and a former partner of Mkhwanazi, who implicated him in alleged unlawful activity.
  • Mkhwanazi denied ordering or authorising any robbery, telling the panel he gave no such instruction.
  • The blue-lights strand, tied to alleged favours for figures linked to Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala and Medicare 24, hung over the session and was set to be tested in detail the next day.
  • All allegations remain untested claims before the Commission; Mkhwanazi has not been convicted and is presumed innocent.

Full coverage

The day, in depth

A suspended metro cop back in the hot seat

Julius Mkhwanazi, suspended as deputy chief of the Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department, resumed his evidence as the Commission widened its look at alleged criminality inside metro policing. Coverage stressed that he is an entirely different person from Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, the KZN commissioner whose July 2025 allegations led President Cyril Ramaphosa to appoint the inquiry. According to reporting, Mkhwanazi faced questions spanning corruption, blue-light privileges and stolen precious stones.

The Rosebank precious-stones claim

Evidence leaders returned to a 2023 operation in Rosebank in which gems allegedly valued at roughly R14.9 million are said to have disappeared. Much of the supporting account was attributed to 'Witness K', a former EMPD inspector and former partner of Mkhwanazi. Mkhwanazi denied giving any instruction to commit a robbery. The claims are allegations that the Commission is still testing.

In their words

Key moments from the record

I did not give any instruction to commit any robbery.
Mkhwanazi denies ordering any robbery. Pressed on the Rosebank operation and the missing precious stones, the suspended EMPD deputy chief rejected any suggestion he had directed a crime.

Our analysis

The bottom line

Day 90 reads as the Commission reconnecting the threads it had left open before the recess: a suspended metro-police boss, a former insider willing to talk, and a cluster of allegations that move from missing gems to blue-light favours. The value of putting Mkhwanazi back on the stand is less about any single admission and more about whether his account holds together once documents, timelines and other witnesses are laid alongside it.

For readers, the naming caution matters. Two men named Mkhwanazi sit at opposite ends of this story: one is the whistle-blower whose claims launched the inquiry, the other is a suspended official answering to it. Conflating them would badly distort the record. On the substance, nothing at this stage is a finding. Mkhwanazi denies wrongdoing, the precious-stones account rests heavily on a single implicated witness, and the presumption of innocence applies until any court or the Commission concludes otherwise.

Analysis is the archive’s own comment on the public proceedings, grounded in the record above. It weighs the evidence and the process; questions of individual guilt are for the courts and the commission to decide. Everyone named is presumed innocent.