Hearing record

Day 45

Witness: Senzo Mchunu

Suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu continues his testimony, defending the disbanding of the political killings task team as lawful housekeeping while the commission probes whether the timing shielded people it was investigating.

Awaiting portrait

The day in brief

What you need to know

  • Mchunu continued responding to allegations that he had links to businessman Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala and alleged intermediary Brown Mogotsi.
  • He testified that the National Political Killings Task Team was operating unlawfully and in breach of the Public Finance Management Act, framing its disbandment as a lawful correction.
  • The commission heard the underlying allegation, from Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, that the team was disbanded to shield politically connected members of a criminal syndicate from prosecution.
  • Justice Madlanga had earlier found it 'very strange' that Mchunu did not raise the planned disbandment with National Commissioner Fannie Masemola when they met at a funeral on 28 December 2024, days before the 31 December directive.
  • Mchunu denies the allegations of criminal ties and political interference.
  • A parliamentary committee later, in July 2026, cleared Mchunu of links to the underworld, though the commission's own assessment is separate and ongoing.

Full coverage

The day, in depth

Lawful housekeeping or a shield?

Mchunu argued the task team had drifted into unlawful operation and PFMA breaches, casting the disbandment as correcting a governance problem rather than protecting anyone. The commission weighed that against the allegation that the unit was actively investigating Matlala when it was shut down. The competing framings - administrative tidy-up versus obstruction - defined the day.

The funeral meeting that wasn't mentioned

A recurring thread was the 28 December 2024 encounter with National Commissioner Fannie Masemola at a funeral, three days before the disbandment directive. Justice Madlanga had called it 'very strange' that Mchunu said nothing about his plan to a figure so central to policing. Mchunu maintained he had acted properly and denied any improper motive.

Our analysis

The bottom line

The heart of Mchunu's defence is a legal characterisation: if the task team was operating unlawfully, disbanding it looks like duty rather than cover-up. The commission's counter-pressure - the timing, the missing consultation, the funeral silence - probes whether lawful-sounding reasons were the real ones. This is contested territory, and Mchunu's denials are entitled to full weight pending any finding.

It is worth separating fora. A parliamentary committee's July 2026 clearance of Mchunu on underworld links speaks to Parliament's inquiry, not the commission's mandate on political interference in the justice system. Readers should not read one body's conclusion as the other's; the Madlanga process continues on its own record.

Analysis is the archive’s own comment on the public proceedings, grounded in the record above. It weighs the evidence and the process; questions of individual guilt are for the courts and the commission to decide. Everyone named is presumed innocent.