Financial ties to 'Cat' Matlala
The commission heard Shibiri received roughly R70,000-R80,000 from Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala, a businessman accused of organised crime, around September 2024. He characterised the relationship as ordinary and denied the money was a bribe; SAPS later found, through an internal process, that associating with a known criminal amounted to misconduct.
The payment he describes as a repaid car loan
Shibiri testified the money was a loan to repair his son's vehicle after an accident, which he repaid in December 2024. Justice Madlanga challenged this, noting his bank records reportedly showed he had ample funds of his own, and questioned whether the repayment was an after-the-fact attempt to recast the payment once Matlala came under scrutiny. No finding of bribery has been made.
Conduct around the Katiso Molefe arrest
The inquiry questioned why Shibiri, though on leave, sought updates after the December 2024 arrest of alleged organised-crime figure Katiso 'KT' Molefe, including a call he said he made to an anonymous witness who disputed receiving it. Shibiri said his interest was legitimate; no finding of interference has been made.
Alleged interference in the Armand Swart murder probe
Evidence before the commission alleged Shibiri tried to influence the investigation into the 2024 murder of engineer Armand Swart, reportedly including an attempt to tempt investigators with envelopes of cash. Shibiri emphatically denied the allegation.
Disputed 'group of five' / 'Big Five' framing
A recorded December 2024 call in which Shibiri referred to a 'group of five' was put to the commission. He denied describing any cartel, saying he had only said Molefe was involved with a 'group of five' with business interests. The fuller 'Big Five' characterisation came from anonymous witnesses, not from him.
Dismissed from SAPS
After an internal disciplinary process, SAPS confirmed in early June 2026 that Shibiri was dismissed - his dismissal letter reportedly served on 22 May 2026 - for misconduct that brought the organisation into disrepute by associating with a known criminal. He is reportedly expected to challenge the decision. This is an internal employment finding, not a criminal conviction.